Tuesday, April 13, 2021


 


 

Monism

Jump to:navigationsearch


The term monism (from the Greek: μόνος monos or "one")—first used by the eighteenth-century German philosopher Christian Wolff to designate philosophical positions asserting either that everything is mental (idealism) or that everything is material (materialism), in order to eliminate the dichotomy of mind and body—has more general applicability today, maintaining that all of reality is ultimately one and indivisible. Two types of monism are usually understood to exist: "substantival" and "attributive" monism. Substantival monism, which is represented by religions such as Hinduism and Buddhism in the East and philosophers such as Baruch Spinoza in the West, holds that the entirety of reality is reducible to only one substance, and that any diversity of reality means just a plurality of aspects or modes of this one substance. By contrast, attributive monism maintains that there is only one category of being, within which there are many different individual things or substances. Attributive monism is further subdivided into three types: idealism, materialism (or physicalism), and neutral monism, and they have shown alternative positions for the discussion of the mind-body problem. 

The quest for oneness has been an important, universal drive and impulse throughout human historyculture, and religious and philosophical thought. Here lies the attractiveness of monism, which subsumes all diversity and heterogeneity into one larger holistic category without internal divisions, although its overemphasis on oneness has also prevented it from being accepted especially in the mainstream culture and religion in the West.

https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Monism



 











 



A dualist model of perception.
AbstractReflexive monism is, in essence, an ancient view of how consciousness relates to the material world that has, in recent decades, been resurrected in modern form. 
Max Velmans has produced Reflexive Monism as a valiantly renewed effort to sort out the confused story of the relations between observer, object, and experience.

 ..............in his Kunstformen der Natur ("Art Forms of Nature"). As a philosopher, Ernst Haeckel wrote Die Welträthsel (1895–1899; in English: The Riddle of the Universe, 1901), the genesis for the term "world riddle" (Welträtsel); ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_Haeckel


An ALU is a combinational logiccircuit, meaning that its outputs will change asynchronously in response to input changes. In normal operation, stable signals are applied to all of the ALU inputs and, when enough time (known as the "propagation delay") has passed for the signals to propagate through the ALU circuitry, the result of the ALU operation appears at the ALU outputs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arithmetic_logic_unit


 














Einstein: ‘Without matter there is no space or time’


Central processing unit


mat·ter
/ˈmadər/
noun
  1. 1
    physical substance in general, as distinct from mind and spirit; (in physics) that which occupies space and possesses rest mass, especially as distinct from energy.
    "the structure and properties of matter"


    mass 

    noun 1a coherent, typically large body of matter with no definite shape.



  1. "a mass of curly hair"
noun
a coherent, typically large body of matter with no definite shape.
"a mass of curly hair"





 1.  a coherent, typically large body of matter with no definite shape.   "a mass of curly hair".    Awareness of and awareness that: 

Awareness of and awareness that: their combination and dynamics

............proposes a logical framework representing the notion of explicit knowledge as the combination of awareness of and awareness that. The setting, semantically combining neighbourhood models with ideas from awareness logic, separates the mere fact of entertaining some information........










Saltation (geology)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saltation_(geology)

Paleomagnetism


Remanence or remanent magnetization or residual magnetism is the magnetizationleft behind in a ferromagnetic material (such as iron) after an external magnetic field is removed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remanence







....The superpyramid held together the intersecting grid points of the chakra's that became the lines of force in these counter-rotating sequences that swirl around in criss-crossing traffic freeways of light intersections like a multicoloured ball of thread. Where all these meridians of past, present and future intersect is the reservoir of Earth's Akashic Record.  

Silk Road Gobi Akashic Grid

  1. (India, cooking) cauliflower
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/gobi 
 Hindi गोभी (gobhī).

From Mongolian Говь (Govʹ) or ᠭᠣᠪᠢ (ɣobi).

Compare Manchu ᡤᠣᠪᡳ (gobi)Chinese 戈壁 (Gēbì).
Definitions

[edit]

  1. wallpartition (Classifier mn)
     /   ―  qiáng  ―  wall
  2. rampartdefensive wall
     /   ―  lěi  ―  rampart; barrier
  3. cliffprecipice
      ―  qiào  ―  cliff; steep
  4. something resembling a walllumensurface
  5. (astronomy) (~宿) Wall (Chinese constellation)


https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/壁#Chinese








Synonyms



Phono-semantic compound (形聲OC *peːɡ): semantic  (earth) + phonetic  (OC*peɡ, *pʰeɡ, *beɡ) – an earthen wall.
simp. and trad.




戈-seal.svg
Pictogram (象形) ― a tool or weapon on a pole, the pole having developed into the long upper-left to lower-right diagonal stroke.

Optical illusion abstract design. Op art pattern. Vector illustration.

Official Disclosure Protocol: TERRARIUM ARhAyas Ascension Earth





phonetic
simp. and trad.
(戈壁)


PHILOSOPHICORUM ITINERIS AEQUALIS

Friday, 7 December 2012

Theogeny II [The Ideology of Change; an Anthropological Error]

Why, following a precise anthropological study of human aesthetics, should naturalism prevail over the spiritual form? Let us pause to consider this spiritual form. Just as I would qualify positivism as a deficient form in the totality of philosophy, so there exists a form that is exclusively spiritual, that is to say 'abstract' and of a purely mental quality. And hence I must declare, once and for all, that I cannot accept a spiritual notion that refers spirituality directly to material things and establishes an indivisible unity with them. From a purely anthropological perspective one must conclude that this kind of spiritual notion of indivisibility is as irresponsible as blind positivism. And just as much as positivism is considered a grounding for anti-philosophical 'brute materialism', the philsophical policy that the spirit is everywhere equal to material things does not promote spiritual people. Instead what you get is a coagulate of irrationalism, super-naturalism and psychic policy in support of regressive animal-empowerment.

It may assist in the prevention of further confusion to note that contemporary spiritual collectivism devotes itself to two conflicting notions. First, the inseperability of spirit and matter would be a gross misconstruction in the abssence of a religious God. Second, the universality of change in the universe would be a gross misconstruction without mind-matter dualism. Spinozoa himself had imagined the first axiom, however with specific theological reservations, and called it pantheism. But regarding the second notion, and grounded as a logical consequence of the first, he believed that nature qua the universe was immutable and thus could not undergo any fundamental or constant changes. Evolution however presuposes a series of transformations towards more advanced structures, in nature's language, life develops, grows, maintains continuous metamorphosis. Change on the other hand is a proverbial superstision today with no real commonality to evolutionary facts or theological principles. Once again, it is an anthropological problem we are faced with — change — with respect to evolution, is not one of nature's plans. Nature strives for heightened complexity, the advancement of life into more integrated, complex life, and, unless an evolutionary extinction is permitted there are no laws governing devolution or regressive 'change'. This change, considered in its progressive stages, seems to be complicated by all the various elements that belong specifically and inevitably to it. 

That monstrous suffering, and that anguished look of melancholy, are the most obvious symptoms of that very fatality in which one can detect a necessity that is clearly anthropological. The characteristics noted with regard to the present phase of the world emphasize the cultural-historical difference between the primitive and the civillized human dynamo, and simillar characteristics are verified in all previous cultural and economic periods arround the world where such dynamics existed. To offer but one parallel: in the history of Greek statuary one can establish with chronological exactness the progress of the gradual dissolving of the element of melancholia, so dimly affirmed throughout the entire archaic period (the closed phase), until one arrives at a balancing-out of that lamentable quality; from the xoanon, monoform and hermetic, to the first freeing of a limb from the body, to progressive movement, and where expression is concerned, to the earliest statue that smiles, precluding classicism — and which attains the fulfillment of its organic and spiritual impulse. It is obvious to the historian to see this melancholic tonality of existence marked throughout the aesthetic milleux of antiquity. But we must also note that there is a similitude to be found between the spiritually detached inertness of the classical statue with the numerous mythical characterizations it displays in society, particularly those expressive nuances that represent the psychological dynamics in today's people.  ....

........*********************************........